Yeah I should have pointed out to look tires over closely. The fine cracks in the tire pictured and the small cuts were presently no big deal.
At a Honda seminar we had a Bridgestone (and former Dunlop) rep talk about tires. He pointed out the small cracks are from the tires drying out at the surface level, the rubber compound has waxes for preservatives in the rubber. They dry out, plus if using any kind of serious chemical based tire cleaners or dressings can also accelerate the drying process. He gave show cars as examples, the tires often look shiny and black, but up close they may be cracking without even being used.
He said if cracks are deeper like some posted above and the cord is visible, do NOT ride the bike until new tires are installed.
One interesting point, when he was in Germany at a tire seminar at Continental, "the boys" got curious... just how much pressure will a tire take? Yep, they had to play. Being at Continental's plant, there was a tire cage and lots of room. They hooked up a high pressure line with a remote valve to the tire and cranked it up. When it finally went bang, I forget what he said was the exact number, but 285 psi stick in my mind... and it was the rim that broke! Crazy!
Oh and one other item to share. The width of tires in a given size, like 130/80, can vary like ±5 mm. So one brand may be closer to 125 while the other is closer to 135. We saw that one time at the shop where I worked. The owner had a 130/80 Bridgestone on the back of his CB900F. When it wore out (which was fast, being the sport compound) he put on a Metzler 130/80 ME-1 on the bike. The difference was HUGE. I think the Bridgestone was more like a 140 and the Metzler was like a 120! We also saw the same thing with front tires back then. The OEM tire on a Nighthawk S was a 110/80-16 Dunlop. When replaced with a Metzler ME-33 the tire had to be the 120/80-16 which was almost identical size to the Dunlop.
When buying tires do take a look at any information on the sites of the manufacturers, some will give the inflated diameter and width in actual measure, not just the sidewall numbers. They will tell the range of rims the tire fits on and the one it was measured on. Dunlop is good about that, I think Bridgestone is too, but it's been a long time since I did anything other than find out about rim size fits for a 160 and 170 width tire, because I wanted a narrower rear tire. The 170 worked for the rim width. I just hate spending big bucks on wide tires that are not needed for street use.
I know, everyone thinks bigger is better, but smaller quickens handling and having a rear tire that services a 120 hp sport bike is a bit of overkill on a 68 hp 700 (per Cycle World dyno test of the FZ-07). Not sure if I want to go to a 110 on the front because it would require front fender relocation to look right. I know the Zephyr 550 I rode and fairly hard, had a 110/80-17 that I switched to a 110/70-16 to quicken handling and it was running a 140/70-18 on the rear. Never had a worry and really think that combination would work really well on the XSR if the rims could have fitted the rear. But no. I have to stick with the 170 and save a bit with about equal wear.